residence on earth

theashleyclements: wilwheaton: jenniferdeguzman: He said Star Trek is too “philosophical”? Screw that noise. mechcanuck: I don’t know when this interview happened but I AM SAD AND ANGRY NOW  The philosophies in Star Trek are kinda part of the actual setting. If you don’t get that, why are you allowed to make Star Trek movies. Sigh. The whole point of Star Trek is that it’s philosophical. If you don’t want philosophical Science Fiction, there’s plenty of that for you to enjoy, but Star Trek is philosophical. Philosophy is part of Star Trek’s DNA, and if you’re given the captain’s chair, you’d better damn well respect that. This just… hurts.  THIS FROM THE MAN WHO CREATED LOST?!?!! what a bunch of bull. i liked the first reboot, but i’ve been scared ever since i saw the preview for “into darkness” that something was amiss with this sequel.theashleyclements: wilwheaton: jenniferdeguzman: He said Star Trek is too “philosophical”? Screw that noise. mechcanuck: I don’t know when this interview happened but I AM SAD AND ANGRY NOW  The philosophies in Star Trek are kinda part of the actual setting. If you don’t get that, why are you allowed to make Star Trek movies. Sigh. The whole point of Star Trek is that it’s philosophical. If you don’t want philosophical Science Fiction, there’s plenty of that for you to enjoy, but Star Trek is philosophical. Philosophy is part of Star Trek’s DNA, and if you’re given the captain’s chair, you’d better damn well respect that. This just… hurts.  THIS FROM THE MAN WHO CREATED LOST?!?!! what a bunch of bull. i liked the first reboot, but i’ve been scared ever since i saw the preview for “into darkness” that something was amiss with this sequel.theashleyclements: wilwheaton: jenniferdeguzman: He said Star Trek is too “philosophical”? Screw that noise. mechcanuck: I don’t know when this interview happened but I AM SAD AND ANGRY NOW  The philosophies in Star Trek are kinda part of the actual setting. If you don’t get that, why are you allowed to make Star Trek movies. Sigh. The whole point of Star Trek is that it’s philosophical. If you don’t want philosophical Science Fiction, there’s plenty of that for you to enjoy, but Star Trek is philosophical. Philosophy is part of Star Trek’s DNA, and if you’re given the captain’s chair, you’d better damn well respect that. This just… hurts.  THIS FROM THE MAN WHO CREATED LOST?!?!! what a bunch of bull. i liked the first reboot, but i’ve been scared ever since i saw the preview for “into darkness” that something was amiss with this sequel.theashleyclements: wilwheaton: jenniferdeguzman: He said Star Trek is too “philosophical”? Screw that noise. mechcanuck: I don’t know when this interview happened but I AM SAD AND ANGRY NOW  The philosophies in Star Trek are kinda part of the actual setting. If you don’t get that, why are you allowed to make Star Trek movies. Sigh. The whole point of Star Trek is that it’s philosophical. If you don’t want philosophical Science Fiction, there’s plenty of that for you to enjoy, but Star Trek is philosophical. Philosophy is part of Star Trek’s DNA, and if you’re given the captain’s chair, you’d better damn well respect that. This just… hurts.  THIS FROM THE MAN WHO CREATED LOST?!?!! what a bunch of bull. i liked the first reboot, but i’ve been scared ever since i saw the preview for “into darkness” that something was amiss with this sequel.theashleyclements: wilwheaton: jenniferdeguzman: He said Star Trek is too “philosophical”? Screw that noise. mechcanuck: I don’t know when this interview happened but I AM SAD AND ANGRY NOW  The philosophies in Star Trek are kinda part of the actual setting. If you don’t get that, why are you allowed to make Star Trek movies. Sigh. The whole point of Star Trek is that it’s philosophical. If you don’t want philosophical Science Fiction, there’s plenty of that for you to enjoy, but Star Trek is philosophical. Philosophy is part of Star Trek’s DNA, and if you’re given the captain’s chair, you’d better damn well respect that. This just… hurts.  THIS FROM THE MAN WHO CREATED LOST?!?!! what a bunch of bull. i liked the first reboot, but i’ve been scared ever since i saw the preview for “into darkness” that something was amiss with this sequel.theashleyclements: wilwheaton: jenniferdeguzman: He said Star Trek is too “philosophical”? Screw that noise. mechcanuck: I don’t know when this interview happened but I AM SAD AND ANGRY NOW  The philosophies in Star Trek are kinda part of the actual setting. If you don’t get that, why are you allowed to make Star Trek movies. Sigh. The whole point of Star Trek is that it’s philosophical. If you don’t want philosophical Science Fiction, there’s plenty of that for you to enjoy, but Star Trek is philosophical. Philosophy is part of Star Trek’s DNA, and if you’re given the captain’s chair, you’d better damn well respect that. This just… hurts.  THIS FROM THE MAN WHO CREATED LOST?!?!! what a bunch of bull. i liked the first reboot, but i’ve been scared ever since i saw the preview for “into darkness” that something was amiss with this sequel.theashleyclements: wilwheaton: jenniferdeguzman: He said Star Trek is too “philosophical”? Screw that noise. mechcanuck: I don’t know when this interview happened but I AM SAD AND ANGRY NOW  The philosophies in Star Trek are kinda part of the actual setting. If you don’t get that, why are you allowed to make Star Trek movies. Sigh. The whole point of Star Trek is that it’s philosophical. If you don’t want philosophical Science Fiction, there’s plenty of that for you to enjoy, but Star Trek is philosophical. Philosophy is part of Star Trek’s DNA, and if you’re given the captain’s chair, you’d better damn well respect that. This just… hurts.  THIS FROM THE MAN WHO CREATED LOST?!?!! what a bunch of bull. i liked the first reboot, but i’ve been scared ever since i saw the preview for “into darkness” that something was amiss with this sequel.theashleyclements: wilwheaton: jenniferdeguzman: He said Star Trek is too “philosophical”? Screw that noise. mechcanuck: I don’t know when this interview happened but I AM SAD AND ANGRY NOW  The philosophies in Star Trek are kinda part of the actual setting. If you don’t get that, why are you allowed to make Star Trek movies. Sigh. The whole point of Star Trek is that it’s philosophical. If you don’t want philosophical Science Fiction, there’s plenty of that for you to enjoy, but Star Trek is philosophical. Philosophy is part of Star Trek’s DNA, and if you’re given the captain’s chair, you’d better damn well respect that. This just… hurts.  THIS FROM THE MAN WHO CREATED LOST?!?!! what a bunch of bull. i liked the first reboot, but i’ve been scared ever since i saw the preview for “into darkness” that something was amiss with this sequel.

theashleyclements:

wilwheaton:

jenniferdeguzman:

He said Star Trek is too “philosophical”? Screw that noise.

mechcanuck:

I don’t know when this interview happened but I AM SAD AND ANGRY NOW 

The philosophies in Star Trek are kinda part of the actual setting. If you don’t get that, why are you allowed to make Star Trek movies.

Sigh. The whole point of Star Trek is that it’s philosophical. If you don’t want philosophical Science Fiction, there’s plenty of that for you to enjoy, but Star Trek is philosophical. Philosophy is part of Star Trek’s DNA, and if you’re given the captain’s chair, you’d better damn well respect that.

This just… hurts. 

THIS FROM THE MAN WHO CREATED LOST?!?!! what a bunch of bull.

i liked the first reboot, but i’ve been scared ever since i saw the preview for “into darkness” that something was amiss with this sequel.

(Source: catbushandludicrous)

Reblogged 1 week ago from theashleyclements (Originally from catbushandludicrous) 23,538 notes